ENHANCED vs. NON-ENHANCED

21 09 2005

I’m still slowly scanning old photos into iPhoto. I just can’t get over the difference between enhanced and non-enhanced pictures. It’s amazing! The below image is a good example, and yes, that’s me in the backpack.

img_momb4after.jpg

My dad is not a computer person, so he doesn’t really understand any of this stuff. I showed him the before and after pictures and even he was impressed. He couldn’t believe that the image had faded that much over the years. The thing is I always remember that picture looking yellowish. I thought it was supposed to look that way. I think that is why I am so amazed at the differences.


Actions

Informations

3 responses to “ENHANCED vs. NON-ENHANCED”

21 09 2005
ninjanun (13:06:28) :

Did you ever get your portrait made at Sears as a child? My hair (and skin) took on a reddish glow in all those pictures. I don’t know if that was a process over time, or if Sears did something funky in development, but it seemed to be a trademark of their photographs.

21 09 2005
ninjanun (13:07:42) :

Or maybe it was TG&Y I was thinking of (remember that store?)

Anyway, that’s quite a difference in your ‘before’ and ‘after’ shot. Do you have to manipulate it, or does iPhoto just automatically adjust it to the appropriate colors?

21 09 2005
Cindy (15:56:07) :

iPhoto has an enhance button and when you click it, it automatically adjusts the picture to the appropriate color. But there’s also a tool bar thingy were you can fine tune the adjustments. There’s a sharpen bar that I’ve been very conservative with. The other day I played around with it and sharpened a picture as far as the bar would allow. It brought the entire picture into focus. Now I have to go back to the others and “fix” them.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Meta